Putin threatens Europe with missles to revive the Pershing crisis.

There is a fairly simple explanation for Mr. Putin's smug threat to target Europe with missiles. One only needs to recall what was going on in Europe in the early 1980-s, According to

In 1982, the controversy over intermediate-range missiles in Europe was at its peak. Anti-Reagan demonstrations in Berlin were so severe that the U.S. Secret Service would not even allow the President to ride in his limousine through the city.

This is exactly what President Putin is aiming at:

The depth of European and especially German fears awakened by the missile confrontation made a deep impression on me. Often at public debates, I could not speak above the jeering from the audience. I was called a warmonger and worse. Mothers with tear-filled eyes carried their babies to me to plead for an end to “American aggression.” Fear of nuclear war had become palpable, and it was driving not a few Germans slightly over the edge. These experiences suggested to me that while the United States had won the military debate and had gained Allied approval to station new missiles in Europe, the Soviets were steadily winning the political and psychological war of words.

The plan is to recreate the old nuclear war fears. I frankly have no way to predict or even to speculate whether Putin's plan will succeed or backfire. I do hope that the Europeans in general and Germans in particular will remember at least two things:
  • Deployment of Pershings most certainly drove Russia to the negotiation table. Mikhail Gorbachev admitted this much in an interview to Radio Echo Moskvy[link in Russian only]:
М. ГОРБАЧЕВ: Нам надо было избавиться от «Першингов», избавиться, потому что подлет ракет к Минску, т.е. к границе – вообще 2 минуты, до Москвы – 5 минут, до Волги – 7 минут. Т.е. практически решение нельзя принять за это время ответное и защититься – нет.
M. Gorbachev: We had to get rid of the Pershings, get rid of them because approach flight to Minsk, i.e. to our Border was altogether 2 minutes, Moscow - 5 minutes, Volga - 7 minutes. I.e. in practical terms no decision on response or defense was possible in that time frame.

Yes, the intellectually superior Europeans and Germans were wrong, and Reagan, that dumb Hollywood cowboy,  was right. How well would the Europeans remember what actually had lead to removal of the missile threat 20 years ago will be the key in how Putin's démarche plays out.
  • It was about deployment of Pershings - nuclear missiles after all - not a harmless radar station and missile interceptors. One thing is to have someone target missiles at you because you have missiles targeted at them, quite another thing is to have somebody targeting you because you are trying to protect yourself. If the intellectually superior Europeans understand this distinction, then Putin's gambit will fail.
There is an additional wedge he is trying to drive in here. He most certainly will expect the more lenient Western Europe to pressure rowdy and unfriendly Eastern Europe, notably Poland and Czech Republic to abandon cooperation with the US missile defense plans. It is only yet another example of how Russia is forcing Europe to take the solidarity test. Energy blackmail over the last year and a half was hardly different. Will Europe stand together with those they have invited and accepted into their Union? So far it had not.

If Putin succeeds in driving this wedge and fanning another hysteria in Germany and elsewhere in Europe, this will be a sorry testament to Europe's state of mind. I do hope this will not have to come. But I have to admit that I have my doubts.

TrackBacks
There are no trackbacks for this entry.

Trackback URL for this entry:
http://cyrillvatomsky.com/trackback.cfm?F7E6329A-3048-77F0-113DE0C7580DBD54

Comments
I remember quite well the 1982 controversy in Europe over the "Ray Gun" deployment of missiles in Europe. But most importantly, I recall that despite opposition by Europe and by the American news media, the deployments took place and the rest is history. Let history repeat itself though not per The Eighteenth Brumaire.
# Posted By John Aguilera | 6/4/07 3:14 PM
That's quite a loaded reference to the 18 Brumaire, John. Sapientis sat.
# Posted By Cyrill | 6/4/07 3:31 PM
Bookmarks:
Add to Technorati FavoritesAdd to Google Reader or HomepageSubscribe in NewsGator OnlineSubscribe in BloglinesAdd to My AOL
BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.5.1.