June 3rd 2007 Embassy of the New World Order Braodcast

As always - this is not a transcript, only a brief outline of the radio show. Go to the blog site and click on "listen" button there when it is available to listen to shows and podcasts. Either listen there or download to your podcast software.

Opening with Hugo Chavez closing RCTV down. Similarities with Putin's policies are obvious. Also obvious is that Chavez is not against media moguls, he is fine with corporations that support him. Just like Putin is. And just like Mussolini was. Fascism, once again is a form of socialism where government and monopolism merge.

Moving on to other subjects, involving recently blogged ones like the Moscow Mayor Luzkov's law suits, rediculous ban on  export of medical specimen as well as perceptions by Russian people of who their friends and foes are.

Who do Russians think their friends are. And what about foes?

Tell me who your friends are, goes an old saying. But how indicative is one's enemy list, especially when the list of friends grows dangerously slim?

Levada Center [unfortunately there is no longer an English language version of the site] has just released results of their study of who do Russians consider friends and foes. Results are all but predictable and Levada Center might just as well can the study for the foreseeable future or at least until coercive state dominated media loosens it grip on propaganda.



Not surprisingly, the two countries Russians consider best friends are Kazakhstan and Belarus. Both autocratic regimes, both highly dependent on Russia economically and politically. Also not surprising is the list of foes. Estonia is the foe number one and Georgia is the foe number two. It is mildly amusing and revealing that such tiny countries are now Russia's biggest foes. Talking of picking on countries from the same league does not cover the monumental differences in size, population, economic and military capacity. So why would this be? Why would Russian people feel threatened, or feel that people from these two tiny countries are the least friendly?

There are two compounding explanations. One obviously is coercion of state dominated media. I personally witnessed media and government induced hysteria on my two previous trips to Russia. Last September it was Georgia and this May it was Estonia. Such a drumbeat of attacks, accusations, snide generalizations, personal and otherwise, will most certainly have an effect on people's thoughts. Especially when opposing opinions are short and far between. Dynamic of apprehension towards Estonia does suggest an artificial spike: 28% last year and 60% this year. Vzglyad [Outlook] Business Daily references "experts" that "have no doubt that the moving a grave site war memorial in Tallinn was the cause". I would recommend that people at Vzglyad look in the mirror - their (together with other media outlets) distinctly negative coverage and fanning of hysteria has just as much to do with the spike.

But to say that Russian people are brainwashed and just swallow all what the establishment PR machine stuffs down their senses would not be fair. Media can not be a sole source for such animosity and expanding the list of "unfriendlies" illustrates a deeper meaning: Estonia, Georgia, Latvia, USA, Lithuania, Ukraine, Poland. If we drop the US from the list for obvious reasons of traditional animosity, the remaining list would shine with one glaring commonality - all these countries have with different levels of success embarked on independent political and economic paths. They have broken away or are trying to break away from the "sphere of influence" and according to some like a Visiting Columbia University Scholar Vasili Rukhadze , countries in that "traditional Russian sphere of interests" [what a monstrous feudalism oozing construct!] are in the gravest of dangers from the current Russian geopolitical offensive.

Against pro-Western post-Soviet countries Russia deploys various tactics: supports shady separatist regimes (against Moldova, Georgia, Azerbaijan); cuts off gas supplies and astronomically raises prices (Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine, Azerbaijan); applies economic sanctions (Moldova, Georgia); manipulates elections in cooperation with local corrupt and criminal elites (Ukraine); detonates local pro-Russian or Russian forces (Georgia, Ukraine, Estonia).

Of course, there is a third explanation and I have very little doubt it would be the most popular in Russia and among Russians themselves - the West is siccing mindless drones against Russia. The same Vzglyad Business Daily quotes the Chairman of the Union of Orthodox Citizens of  the Ukraine (sic!) Mr. Kaurov as suggesting that "orange" sentiments and desires to join NATO  have had "a detrimental effect on relationships between our countries". The article itself is called "USA trained enemies of Russia", while there is nothing in the body of the article to warrant such a screaming headline. One of the worst cases of petty journalistic dirty tricks Russian media is so full of these days.

Germany made it to number 3 on the list of biggest friends of Russia. It is an interesting but not an unexpected development. Russia has a history of pendulum shifts in relations with European powers. Sometime it would gravitate towards France, sometimes it would gravitate towards Germany. Only a quarter of respondents felt this way about Germany the third country on the list vs. 38% and 39% respectively that feel Belarus and Kazakhstan are friends. Tell me who your friends are...

The biggest surprise to me was inclusion of China as number four best friend of Russia. Talk about wishful thinking and delusions. In fairness, China has dropped and only 19% consider it a friend vs. 24% last year.

US commands a respectable 35% of those that think it is unfriendly to Russia, but this number had decreased since 2006 by 2% despite of all the anti-US rhetoric. Finally, 10% of Russians think there aren't any countries friendly to Russia. 2% think there aren't any unfriendly ones.

A Scary Thought of the Week - Will Baltic States Survive?

I just came back from an exciting and always invigorating Memorial Day weekend trip to London, only to read an interview with Economist's Edward Lucas at Marginalia blog. I spent quite some time there in wandering around town, ST. Paul, Westminster Abbey, looking among other things at memorials to those perished over the XX-th century. Beds of red poppies in England always produce bitter sweet butterflies in my stomach. What Sacrifice!

You want scary? Here is your scary thought for the week from Edward Lucas:

For the first time since 1993, I no longer feel confident that the Baltic states will survive: the potentially lethal combination is Russian money and western weakness.

It is scary not because of how imposing, assertive and in the long run, aggressive Russia has become. There is a cold chill of Munich and betrayal of Poland oozing from this sentiment. Will The West betray the Balts again?

On the emotional level, the first reaction is resentment. These countries are all NATO members. This can't be. US and UK will not forget and forgo NATO members, even if Europe will. And European Union is different from NATO, isn't it?

But then I look at the rise of petty isolationism, the rise of petty nationalistic temper tantrums in the US both on the left and on the right and realize that if these people ever get to power in the USA, they will forgo the Balts just like they want to forgo Iraqi people now and cut and run in the face of difficulties or, in most cases of the left - for petty political gains.

The West owes Eastern Europe big time. Abandoning them to the USSR allowed the West to recover, flourish and eventually reclaim therm back peacefully, but lives of generations were lost. Only the first half of my life was lost in the USSR but the feeling of loss is quite strong nonetheless, believe me.

Even during these proudest of moments, while reflecting on previous sacrifices we should never forget that they will mean nothing if more sacrifices are not made because the work has not been finished. Resting on laurels of others will get us nowhere. Call this pompous all you will. I will raise you your petty cynicism.

I do hope what Lucas is warning about will never come to pass.

Bookmarks:
Add to Technorati FavoritesAdd to Google Reader or HomepageSubscribe in NewsGator OnlineSubscribe in BloglinesAdd to My AOL
BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.5.1.