Who do Russians think their friends are. And what about foes?

Tell me who your friends are, goes an old saying. But how indicative is one's enemy list, especially when the list of friends grows dangerously slim?

Levada Center [unfortunately there is no longer an English language version of the site] has just released results of their study of who do Russians consider friends and foes. Results are all but predictable and Levada Center might just as well can the study for the foreseeable future or at least until coercive state dominated media loosens it grip on propaganda.



Not surprisingly, the two countries Russians consider best friends are Kazakhstan and Belarus. Both autocratic regimes, both highly dependent on Russia economically and politically. Also not surprising is the list of foes. Estonia is the foe number one and Georgia is the foe number two. It is mildly amusing and revealing that such tiny countries are now Russia's biggest foes. Talking of picking on countries from the same league does not cover the monumental differences in size, population, economic and military capacity. So why would this be? Why would Russian people feel threatened, or feel that people from these two tiny countries are the least friendly?

There are two compounding explanations. One obviously is coercion of state dominated media. I personally witnessed media and government induced hysteria on my two previous trips to Russia. Last September it was Georgia and this May it was Estonia. Such a drumbeat of attacks, accusations, snide generalizations, personal and otherwise, will most certainly have an effect on people's thoughts. Especially when opposing opinions are short and far between. Dynamic of apprehension towards Estonia does suggest an artificial spike: 28% last year and 60% this year. Vzglyad [Outlook] Business Daily references "experts" that "have no doubt that the moving a grave site war memorial in Tallinn was the cause". I would recommend that people at Vzglyad look in the mirror - their (together with other media outlets) distinctly negative coverage and fanning of hysteria has just as much to do with the spike.

But to say that Russian people are brainwashed and just swallow all what the establishment PR machine stuffs down their senses would not be fair. Media can not be a sole source for such animosity and expanding the list of "unfriendlies" illustrates a deeper meaning: Estonia, Georgia, Latvia, USA, Lithuania, Ukraine, Poland. If we drop the US from the list for obvious reasons of traditional animosity, the remaining list would shine with one glaring commonality - all these countries have with different levels of success embarked on independent political and economic paths. They have broken away or are trying to break away from the "sphere of influence" and according to some like a Visiting Columbia University Scholar Vasili Rukhadze , countries in that "traditional Russian sphere of interests" [what a monstrous feudalism oozing construct!] are in the gravest of dangers from the current Russian geopolitical offensive.

Against pro-Western post-Soviet countries Russia deploys various tactics: supports shady separatist regimes (against Moldova, Georgia, Azerbaijan); cuts off gas supplies and astronomically raises prices (Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine, Azerbaijan); applies economic sanctions (Moldova, Georgia); manipulates elections in cooperation with local corrupt and criminal elites (Ukraine); detonates local pro-Russian or Russian forces (Georgia, Ukraine, Estonia).

Of course, there is a third explanation and I have very little doubt it would be the most popular in Russia and among Russians themselves - the West is siccing mindless drones against Russia. The same Vzglyad Business Daily quotes the Chairman of the Union of Orthodox Citizens of  the Ukraine (sic!) Mr. Kaurov as suggesting that "orange" sentiments and desires to join NATO  have had "a detrimental effect on relationships between our countries". The article itself is called "USA trained enemies of Russia", while there is nothing in the body of the article to warrant such a screaming headline. One of the worst cases of petty journalistic dirty tricks Russian media is so full of these days.

Germany made it to number 3 on the list of biggest friends of Russia. It is an interesting but not an unexpected development. Russia has a history of pendulum shifts in relations with European powers. Sometime it would gravitate towards France, sometimes it would gravitate towards Germany. Only a quarter of respondents felt this way about Germany the third country on the list vs. 38% and 39% respectively that feel Belarus and Kazakhstan are friends. Tell me who your friends are...

The biggest surprise to me was inclusion of China as number four best friend of Russia. Talk about wishful thinking and delusions. In fairness, China has dropped and only 19% consider it a friend vs. 24% last year.

US commands a respectable 35% of those that think it is unfriendly to Russia, but this number had decreased since 2006 by 2% despite of all the anti-US rhetoric. Finally, 10% of Russians think there aren't any countries friendly to Russia. 2% think there aren't any unfriendly ones.

Iraq troop escalation, Iran's oil crisis, Russia vs. Belarus and Hugo Chavez

January 14th broadcast of the Embassy of the New World Order.

Just another installment of utter brilliance... as one of the callers said.

Subjects for this January 14th edition of the Emabssy of the New World Order on KSCO AM 1080 included:

  • Escalation and surge of troops in Iraq. There is at least one aspect that must be considered before any comments are made and way too many armchair admirals and generals do not understand it. I have to admit that I myself foolishly neglected to find out more about numbers and was of the opinion that additional 20,000 are not enough compared to 140,000 already there. Well, it appears that in terms of Baghdad proper, this escalation and surge will more then double US troop contingent. According to Economist, 5 brigades will be added to 4 stationed there. Since Baghdad is the central point for the push, my optimism levels have risen to manageable levels.
  • La Patria o la tumba! Hugo Chavez is dropping silly pretense and is calling himself for the communist he is. He is embarking on the path of late Salvadore Allende nationalizing communications, energy and oil industries. Considering records of Communist states or states with nationalized pyramid economies like USSR running out of grain with all the Ukrainian topsoil, the end result will be Venezuela running out of oil, oil money and making its people even more poor.
  • Case to the point is a shocking prediction of  Iran running out of oil. Not out of oil in the ground, but out of oil available for consumption. Combine this with German Gref's warning that Russia might run out of natural gas for internal use. Oil prices have been on decline for some time now hovering just above $50 per barrel. Iran and Russia whose governments survive because of the petrodollars they rake in, might begin to feel the pinch if the situation continues to deteriorate. Especially if it is true that 70% of Iran's budget is based on oil revenues.
  • Quick commentary on yet another PR fiasco the inept Putin Inc administration dragged Russia into - the quarrel with Belarus over oil and gas supplies, Gazprom's stake in Belarusneftegaz as well as another reminder to the Europeans of how reliable as a partner Russia can be.
As always much more substance, callers, funnies in the podcast. Download and enjoy.

The Lukashenka and Putin Gas Gambit - Love Thy Neighbour and His Gas.

The tempest in the Minsk teapot is brewing into a regional tornado that eventually threatens to wipe Belarus democratically self-elected President Aleksander Lukashenka off the political map of Europe.

 
To recap from the very beginning:
  • Some time in the past Mr. Putin decided to abandon considerations for unification of Belarus and Russia into a new state entity thus allowing Mr. Putin to run for the third term as President of Russia, making democratically self-elected Lukashenka a mere nuisance and a waste of hard earned petrodollars.
  • Also some time in the past, democratically self-elected Belarus President Alexander Lukashenka mouthed something that Mr. Putin found offensive.
  • Russia decided to raise prices Belarus pays for natural gas imports from Russia to $200 per 1,000 cubic meters. On the surface, this goes along the lines of “Russia(Gazprom) ain’t Santa Claus.” Too true. Calendar based contracts turn democratically elected CEO of Russia Inc into a Grinch instead.
What drives this crisis? Is it Putin’s temper tantrum, his vindictiveness or maybe his desire to save Russia millions or billions of petrodollars that can be used to build more nuclear submarines to fight the war in Chechnya? All possible explanations but there is one aspect of this story that makes me think  that, as it has been through most of Putin’s presidency, interests of Russia as a country are substituted with interests of Russia Inc, its owners and management.
 
Lukashenka dangled a bait in front of Gazprom in the form of the 50% stake in the Belarus pipeline monopoly Beltransgaz. Initial assessment put the price tag of Beltransgaz at half a billion. However correct this assessment was, Gazprom apparently agreed to $3B. Or even $5B
 
In an opinion and analysis piece RIA Novosti asks “Gazprom vs. Lukashenko: who is trapped?” Indeed:
Moscow was forced to make concessions. Gazprom agreed to Beltransgaz's assessment of $3 billion. Last week it was already talking about $5 billion.
Now, suddenly, less then a week before the New Year, there is no contract for either Gazprom gas supplies to Belarus nor there is a contract for the 50% stake. And what is more, according to Minsk, there is no contract for Russia to transit its gas through Beltransgaz to Poland, Baltic States and Kaliningrad region.
 
Lukashenka’s cadre now demand Belarus pays the same price as the Russian city of Smolensk does. And they stated quite pointedly that any transit of gas via Beltransgaz will be considered contraband.
 
True, Russia and Gazprom can turn Belarus spigot completely off but there is yet another problem.  According to Kommersant three out of five pumping stations along the Yamal-Europe pipeline belong to Beltransgaz. If Putin Inc turns off Belarus spigot, then Lukashenka Inc can turn off these stations, dropping pipeline pressure so much that Russia would not be able to supply what Europe demands.
 
Taking Lukashenka’s bait and eye-gorging the potential expansion of its pipeline infrastructure trapped Gazprom and Putin Inc., leaving nobody else to blame but own greed.
 
Belarus might be a tougher nut to crack then Ukraine that folded last year in 4 days. Authoritarian ways of Lukashenka, his popularity as well as nationalism he managed to stir up in Belarus will help to stand up to the blockade.  Most power stations in Belarus are apparently being switched to fuel oil.
 
Belarus is not a signatory to the EU energy charter and can set up any rates for transit via its pipelines. On the other hand, Ukraine, now back into Russia’s fold with PM Yanukovich at the helm can easily step in and relieve some of the pressure. How reliable an ally Yanukovich is to Putin Inc remains to be seen.
 
Thinking of the previous entry in my blog, I wonder if Putin Inc will be less inept in trying to get its hands on Turkmenistan's natual gas assets or infrastructure.
 
Happy New Year.

Bookmarks:
Add to Technorati FavoritesAdd to Google Reader or HomepageSubscribe in NewsGator OnlineSubscribe in BloglinesAdd to My AOL
BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.5.1.