Russia is not really unique.

At last, I got off my behind and actually did what I promised: I am posting this podcast of the latest Embassy of The New World Order radio show on KSCO AM 1080.
To get to the podcast, follow the link with the title of the article and then click on listen.

And as I promised elsewhere I talked a bit about the The New Republic column by Michael Idov. I tried to put some of Idov's  observations  tp make a point that although he is writing about Russia, he in a sense is not. He describes a late feudal society and lots of features of contemporary Russia are universal. Some Russians love to talk about how unique it is and how it always takes its own way. Too bad most of the time it is a detour.

Cusiously this article created quite a flurry of posts in English Language Russia-related blogosphere and opinions are quite different. Some predictably claim Russophobia, some liked it for its lack of corny  Cold War era slogans.

So i used the article as a trampoline to satisfy my own propensity for tangents ranging from Chinese manufacturing to Friedrich Barbarossa to Felipe Calderon and his meek attempts to revitalize Pemex. All of that by the way came from the Idov's article.

Predictably, when issue of globalization is addressed (and I did talk about the Columbian Free  Trade deal in the very end) some jump to talk about immigration. Illegal immigration is a painful subject int eh US especially among the talk radio population. So I got some of that as well.

As always, this is just a quick note, not even a summary of what the show was about. I thought it was a good one, so give a listen if you have time and interest.

Truly.

Putin wants his own little WTO.

Back in Russia there was an old joke about a young surgeon right out of college performing his first surgery, then frustrated at his own failure, he started slashing the poor patient yelling "this one doesn't work, bring me another one!" I know: gross, but illustrative. Russia seems to have a problem with getting bilateral agreements to join WTO. In order to join this heir to GATT, any applicant must conclude bilateral negotiations with every single existing member. Russia has been so pushy lately, using economic policy for purposes of political pressure, some countries like Georgia that was hit by a wine and mineral water embargo just seem to balk.

What does a frustrated President of Russia have to do in this situation? Call for another body. Mr. Putin wants to create his own WTO, since he can't get into the real thing. A temper tantrum to be sure; not as gross, but still illustrative.

Naturally, Mr. Putin immediately got supporters for his grandiose idea of setting his own skull and bones: the biggest friend of all Russians (according to the polls, no less) Narsultan Nazarbaev, the democratically self elected President of Kazakhstan wants to join in. Kazakhstan is not currently a WTO member.

Mr. Putin insisted that "International organizations are in need of restructuring and modernization."

"These structures that were created for many active players look outdated, undemocratic and awkward, unable to consider changing balance of power" ... "One can see this in the stalled Doha Round of the WTO" - said the Russian President according to the Vzglyad Business Daily , that adds also that old methods do not work in new conditions, whatever it means. USA Today offers this version :

Putin said the stalled Doha round of global trade talks were a sign of the problems with the organization: "Old methods of decision-making at times don't work.".

Again, whatever it means. Too bad USA Today leaves out some of the more interesting quotes from Vzglyad Business Daily.

Medvedev, Russian First (or is it second) Deputy Prime Minister and at the same time Gazprom Chairman of the Board is in agreement. To be sure, some accusations of protectionism Putin and Medvedev level against developed western economies are quite true and should make the US and Europe feel ashamed. These protectionist barriers need to go.

It is however amusing to hear this from the President of Russia who had presided over a de-facto nationalization program creating a situation in Russia when state investments in the economy just recently surpassed private sector investments. It is also amusing to hear Medvedev's "When someone wants to take something away from somebody; that someone will without exception loose something of his own". No kidding, Sherlock. Go tell this to Shell or BP, mister Chairman of the Board of Gazprom.

Jokes aside, however, Putin's and Medvedev's comments should be taken very seriously. They don't only illustrate frustration of people tired of the slow process; they suggest a certain mindset that an international super body like WTO needs to react to changing balance of power - economic or otherwise. This is exactly the opposite to what WTO needs to be - an impartial arbiter of economic disputes. Putin's suggestion is also quite a bit arrogant, since WTO is not something that was concocted recently. It took half a century to become what it is now. Putin's little plan is nothing but a regional trading setup like NAFTA. Any claim of some grandiose future and an alternative to WTO is yet another example of longing for lost power of the USSR and the bypolar world. To support this general idea Putin seems to be invoking the tried old claim of the decline of the developed capitalism.

"The world is indeed changing before our eyes. Countries that yesterday seemed hopelessly behind are today the fastest growing economies of the world," Putin told a gathering of business leaders and government officials at an economic forum in Russia's second-largest city of St. Petersburg according to AP via CNN.  

"If, 50 years ago, 60 percent of the world's GDP came from G-7 countries, then today it is the other way around," he said.

Coming home from the last week G-8 meeting and immediately juxtaposing himself and his country to the old G-7 suggests he received a very cold shoulder in Germany. Mr. Putin needs to decide for himself if he wants to be a member of the good old boys or whether he wants to lead the pitchfork brigade to topple it. If Mr. Putin decides to abandon G-8, he might not get to be the rebel leader. China could easily overshadow Russia's economic prowess and claim the leadership ring, since without China's 15% of World's GDP Mr. Putin's claim would be meaningless.

Putin also said that global financial markets have evolved around "one or two" currencies -- an apparent reference to the euro and the dollar -- and their fluctuations often have highly negative effects on many countries' economies and financial reserves.

"There can be only one answer to this challenge: the creation of several world currencies, several financial centers," he said.

Here is yet another pipe dream. The more I read about Mr. Puttin's speech while writing this piece, the more I see how utterly ignorant he is about the fundamentals of capitalism. He thinks the global financial system can be changed by a decree. He is not alone, of course. Lots of conspiracy theory nutcases think it is run by decrees, but what a company to keep!

Russia's WTO ascension is a very complex issue. On one hand, blocking it from WTO membership will only exacerbate its problems and will reinforce the paranoid view of the West that a lot of people in Russia seem to be developing. On the other hand, if Russia becomes a WTO member before the Ukraine, does anyone have any doubts Russia would try to use its membership as an instrument of political pressure, just like Georgia does now?

With either Medvedev or Ivanov posed to be Putin's heirs, there isn't much one can expect in terms of change. After all, Mr. Medvedev is on record suggesting that preventing Gazprom from becoming an integrated vertical natural gas supplier in UK by blocking its potential takeover of Centrica would "mean the end of real capitalism" The man does not understand that real capitalism is where monopolies like his own Gazprom are legally prevented from existence.

Overall, however, Russia needs to become a WTO member and the sooner the better. WTO membership will help tame the feeling of isolation and weird aspirations of being a counterweight to the capitalist west. It will start molding Russian wild state capitalist kleptocracy into something more humane. In the long run it might help break up state monopolies and with them might help loosen the stranglehold the current crop of Putin's oligarchs has over Russian politics and government. Mr. Putin's current apprehension about the WTO is very easy to understand:

'Globalization does not respect spheres of influence,' said Peter Mandelson, the European Union trade commissioner. 'Membership in the WTO is Russia`s ticket to a rules-based system.'

Putin, Friedman, NATO and Cold War II.

Opening is a short comment on the previous week broadcast where a challenge was made that this show’s audience is too small and too intelligent, meaning this show’s content is way over most people’s heads.

I can not disagree more. My experience in this country and abroad tells me, borrowing Peggy Noonan’s words, this is the country of sophisticates. And there is no surprise for me in this. The amount of information, of different positions that this country is exposed to, vs. unanimity of media in other countries is the key to understand why United States is a country of sophisticates. And I am not talking about Russia some other country where a huge portion of the media is controlled by the government one way or another. How about UK, and its puny radio industry: BBC1, BBC2, BBC3, BBC4 and so on simulcasting both in FM and AM!

I will state this again: if there is something most valuable I brought with me from the USSR, something I learned because of my experiences there – that will be the conclusion that unanimity is not a good thing. Unanimity is dangerous, it is stagnating, it is bad for society.

 Plurality of ideas is what makes this country great and sophisticated. The free market of ideas, just like the free market of anything else: Coke vs. Pepsi, Left vs. Right, Nike vs. Reebok. The best will survive and the looser will die.

To those that called last week and supported this show, thank you, but I am not surprised – sophisticates need intellectual stimulation and this is once again the reason. We in this country get so much intellectual stimulation by being exposed to plurality of ideas that our mind bandwidth expands. The first law of dialectics at play: accumulation of quantity and transformation of accumulated quantity into new quality.

The media, however is somewhat a different story. Last week Mr. Putin made a speech in Munich that some treated as a declaration of the new Cold War. Unfortunately for Putin, a bimbo died in the US and the US media went into a carrion feeding frenzy of 24/7 dead bimbo coverage. Cold War? Who cares… Here is a good assessment of the situation by Ariel Cohen.

Putin waxed nostalgic about the bi-polar world in which the U.S. and the USSR checked each other's ambition through a balance of nuclear terror known as Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD). Many Russian and Western experts perceive Putin's speech as a declaration of a new Cold War.

Moving on to apparent exception to the first law of dialectics: Thomas L. Freidman and his syndicated column about Putin’s speech in Munich. I do not for the life of me, understand how is it possible that Thomas L. Friedman still has no clue about Russia its policies and goals. He takes a cue from Putin, complaining about expansion of NATO and tries to sell it as his own conclusion. How pathetically transparent! Then he insults people that suffered long and hard behind the iron curtain:

OK, fine, we were ready to enrage Russia to expand NATO, but what have we gotten out of it? The Czech navy?

Nice going Mr. Friedman, duh, very funny indeed. Have you no shame dishing out this condescending spite towards the country twice before betrayed by the West?  We in the West must support and protect those that want to join our club of democratic capitalism. If and when Russia wants to join, we should invite it as well. Friedman clearly does not get it. He also makes absolutely clueless claims like:

For those of us who opposed NATO expansion, the point was simple: There is no major geopolitical issue, especially one like Iran, that we can resolve without Russia's help.

How can a person that travels around the globe think that the world is flat? How can someone with that kind of experience and knowledge not understand that it is not in Russia’s interests to resolve the situation with Iran? Just look at the map and ponder the importance of the Caspian Sea, Central Asian Oil and Gas, Russia’s desire to keep its virtual monopoly on access to Central Asia. It is clear as day to me and I wonder why is it not clear as day to Thomas L. Friedman that it is completely futile to expect Putin’s Russia Inc. to help. This issue also later comes up during my conversation with caller Kenny who also inquired about Putin’s personal oil and gas interests and ambition. Take a listen.

The bottom line is if Russia wants to be a petro-cartel then the status quo is in its interests, nothing else.

Then there is David Ignatius

Russia is back. That's the real lesson I take from Putin's blunt comments. A country that was near collapse after the fall of Soviet communism has regained enough confidence and stability to take a verbal shot at its old rival.

This is equally silly. How confident and stable is Chavez, or Ahmadinejad who constantly snipe at the US. Obviously, Krauthammer he is not.

How similar are the 2007 and 1994 North Korea agreements? Have a listen as well.

The Lukashenka and Putin Gas Gambit - Love Thy Neighbour and His Gas.

The tempest in the Minsk teapot is brewing into a regional tornado that eventually threatens to wipe Belarus democratically self-elected President Aleksander Lukashenka off the political map of Europe.

 
To recap from the very beginning:
  • Some time in the past Mr. Putin decided to abandon considerations for unification of Belarus and Russia into a new state entity thus allowing Mr. Putin to run for the third term as President of Russia, making democratically self-elected Lukashenka a mere nuisance and a waste of hard earned petrodollars.
  • Also some time in the past, democratically self-elected Belarus President Alexander Lukashenka mouthed something that Mr. Putin found offensive.
  • Russia decided to raise prices Belarus pays for natural gas imports from Russia to $200 per 1,000 cubic meters. On the surface, this goes along the lines of “Russia(Gazprom) ain’t Santa Claus.” Too true. Calendar based contracts turn democratically elected CEO of Russia Inc into a Grinch instead.
What drives this crisis? Is it Putin’s temper tantrum, his vindictiveness or maybe his desire to save Russia millions or billions of petrodollars that can be used to build more nuclear submarines to fight the war in Chechnya? All possible explanations but there is one aspect of this story that makes me think  that, as it has been through most of Putin’s presidency, interests of Russia as a country are substituted with interests of Russia Inc, its owners and management.
 
Lukashenka dangled a bait in front of Gazprom in the form of the 50% stake in the Belarus pipeline monopoly Beltransgaz. Initial assessment put the price tag of Beltransgaz at half a billion. However correct this assessment was, Gazprom apparently agreed to $3B. Or even $5B
 
In an opinion and analysis piece RIA Novosti asks “Gazprom vs. Lukashenko: who is trapped?” Indeed:
Moscow was forced to make concessions. Gazprom agreed to Beltransgaz's assessment of $3 billion. Last week it was already talking about $5 billion.
Now, suddenly, less then a week before the New Year, there is no contract for either Gazprom gas supplies to Belarus nor there is a contract for the 50% stake. And what is more, according to Minsk, there is no contract for Russia to transit its gas through Beltransgaz to Poland, Baltic States and Kaliningrad region.
 
Lukashenka’s cadre now demand Belarus pays the same price as the Russian city of Smolensk does. And they stated quite pointedly that any transit of gas via Beltransgaz will be considered contraband.
 
True, Russia and Gazprom can turn Belarus spigot completely off but there is yet another problem.  According to Kommersant three out of five pumping stations along the Yamal-Europe pipeline belong to Beltransgaz. If Putin Inc turns off Belarus spigot, then Lukashenka Inc can turn off these stations, dropping pipeline pressure so much that Russia would not be able to supply what Europe demands.
 
Taking Lukashenka’s bait and eye-gorging the potential expansion of its pipeline infrastructure trapped Gazprom and Putin Inc., leaving nobody else to blame but own greed.
 
Belarus might be a tougher nut to crack then Ukraine that folded last year in 4 days. Authoritarian ways of Lukashenka, his popularity as well as nationalism he managed to stir up in Belarus will help to stand up to the blockade.  Most power stations in Belarus are apparently being switched to fuel oil.
 
Belarus is not a signatory to the EU energy charter and can set up any rates for transit via its pipelines. On the other hand, Ukraine, now back into Russia’s fold with PM Yanukovich at the helm can easily step in and relieve some of the pressure. How reliable an ally Yanukovich is to Putin Inc remains to be seen.
 
Thinking of the previous entry in my blog, I wonder if Putin Inc will be less inept in trying to get its hands on Turkmenistan's natual gas assets or infrastructure.
 
Happy New Year.

And so it begins: Saparmurat Niyazov, Turkmenbashi dies with no heir apparent.

Another one bites the dust... I know it is not nice to say bad things about recently dead people, but what good could you say about recently dead really bad guy? Who really was worse then Saparmurat Niyazov, the petty dictator of the poor Central Asian nation of Turkmenistan? The guy that stole national wealth from his people to adorn his capital city with golden statues of himself? Burn in hell, jerk would be more appropriate I think, albeit childish.

 
I do not think the world would even look back and remember the name of Turkmenbashi in a week, since we will all be watching the drama of succession. It does not make us look too good with popcorn and all elbowing our way closer to the screen, but let's not forget that the interest is quite genuine although admittedly not purely humanitarian. There is quite a bit at stake related to succession of Turkmenistan:
  • Huge natural gas reserves made Turkmenistan a magnet for influences. Without Turkmen gas Russia would not be able to honor its gas supply obligations to Europe and have much l;eft over for its internal consumption.
  • Europe is seriously dependent on Russian/Turkmen natural gas supplies.
  • So, instability of Turkmenistan would theoretically be a bad thing for both Russia and Europe, unless...
There is another aspect that needs to be considered. Turkmenbashi has been trying to strike it on his own for a while. He demonstrably stuck his thumb up Mr. Putin's nose with demanding knowledge of the Turkmen language even for college exams. Ethnic Russians have been leaving Turkmenistan in droves since then. Niyasov also entertained direct contacts with the Ukraine and other not so Russia friendly consumers of natural gas, but he has always been landlocked.
 
Who knows what Russian politics would be in this situation. As I have stated many times, fundamental national interests of Russia have been supplemented with interests of Putin Inc., and I have a nasty feeling those interests will see an opening to tie Turkmen natural gas to itself by trading support for a new ruler in exchange for either PSA or even direct ownership. After all, people that pulled the Yukos/Baikal/Rosneft affair should be able to do even more.
 
The succession fighting has already began - figuratively for now Although Turkmenistan Constitution meant the speaker to become an interim President, a deputy Prime Minister somehow got the job and...
ALMATY, Dec. 23 (Xinhua) -- Turkmenistan's acting President Gurbanguly Berdymukhamedov has sacked the country's Parliament speaker Ovezgeldy Atayev, Turkmen state television reported Saturday.  "You have been relieved from the post of parliament speaker," Berdymukhamedov said on state television after the chamber voted to strip Atayev of his immunity.
also:
Speaker of Turkmen Parliament Ovezgeldy Atayev has been arrested, APA special reporter in Turkmenistan reports. Criminal proceedings were instituted against the speaker two hours later the news about Saparmurat Niyazov’s death was announced. Under the Constitution, the presidential powers must be transferred to the parliament speaker.
The West is taking the situation seriously expecting fighting to go beyond figurative:
WASHINGTON, Dec. 21 (UPI) -- Security experts are recommending that Americans and other foreigners prepare to leave Turkmenistan.
It is quite possible that the succession issue has been at least temporarily resolved and the Turkmenbasi did not die on the 21st - but some time earlier
Some claim that one and a half month before he had some operations (heart, eye and leg) and died 20-25 days before (according to some Russian resources 3 days ago), and in this period internal dynamics of Turkmenistan compromised on the solution. In fact, official declaration of the name of the Vice President and Mister of Healt Kurbanguli Berdimuhammedov is giving the impression that the leadership problem has been solved for the time being.

It will be interesting to see who would eventually emerge and the new basi. Somehow I think we have not heard last from Lt. Gen. Geldimukhammed Ashirmukhammedov, the security minister.

Mr Putin's business plan: Russia Oil and Gas Inc.

Is this where the golden secure parachute will be found for Vladimir Putin when he is termed out from the presidency of Russia in 2008?

 
On Saturday Russian President Vladimir Putin held a meeting of the Russian Security Council at which a new strategy that would give the government control of gas and oil extraction from the Russian shelf was discussed. It is hoped that the shelf will be Russia’s main energy resource base for the 21st century. To achieve this goal, the strategy calls for an end to joint-venture projects and a renewed focus on Russia’s home-grown strengths. To that end, the Russian gas and oil giants Gazprom, Rosneft, and Zarubezhneft may be combined into a single government monopoly that would take over the shelf, which would mean new inspections and headaches for foreign operators already working there
It has been my view for a while now, that Mr. Putin is not a politician. He is a businessman and he is building Russian Oil and Gas Inc, i.e. The Company for himself to dwarf the power any oil baron has ever had.
 
Here are some components of this Plan in no particular order and with all necessary references to Umberto Eco:
  • Decimation of Yukos and transfer of its assets to Roseneft for pennies on the dollar. 
  • Appointment of Putin's long time personal secretary and aid Igor Sechin to Chairmanship of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.
  • Float the Rosneft IPO at FTSE. The IPO was coordinated with the Kremlin.
  • Alexei Miller, another Putin's confidant from when Putin was deputy Mayor of St. Petersburg is the CEO of Gazprom.
  • Valery Golubyev yet another ex-KGB, ex-St. Peterburg government confidant was appointed to run Gazprom's oil arm.
  • German Gref, Russian Economic Development minister made a mistake suggesting to split Gazprom. Mr. Putin had a talk with him and the issue is no longer on the agenda.
  • Earlier this year Gazprom was given the natural gas export monopoly.
  • Gazprom now has former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder on its payroll
Putin considers it a personal achievement that Gazprom is now worth about $260 billion and ranks as the third-largest corporation worldwide in terms of market capitalization, after ExxonMobil and General Electric. The position Gazprom now holds in the international energy trade is "the result of concerted state activity," Putin said in his state of the nation address in May.
  • Use Gazprom's subsidiary Gazprom Media to take control of the major private - as it was at the time - TV Channel NTV.
  • Use Gazprom to exert (or is it extort) influence over neighbouring states by either closing or threatening to close the natural gas or oil spigots.
  • Use Gazprom to literally incite rebellions in disputed or breakaway areas of independent states formerly parts of the USSR.
Gazprom's leadership went as far as receiving South Ossetian "President" Eduard Kokoity for negotiations last October. The subject of the negotiations was an ambitious pipeline construction project. The pipeline would lead across the Caucasian Crest and into South Ossetia's capital city of Tskhinvali. Both the smirking rebel leader and the Gazprom managers knew only too well that the project, developed by the Kremlin, wasn't motivated by expectation of financial gain, but by the desire for political power.
  • Use Schröder and the proposed pipeline across the Baltic Sea to drive a wedge between Western Europe and ungrateful former USSR sattelites and colonies like Poland, Ukraine, Estonia , Latvia and Lithuania, by threatening to isolate them from energy resources.
  • Actively use foreign policy of Russia to destabilize the Caucuses region via Chechnya, South Ossetia, Abkhazia and prevent more capital investment in creating pipelines that would bypass Russia, threatening its monopoly and leverage power, and connect Central Asian energy resources with access to Black and to Mediterranean seas. 
  • Begin harassment of foreign investors (Sakhalin) with the aim of either forcing new conditions or altogether forcing them away.
None of these actions are really political in nature, but represent a sound planning to use the muscle of Presidency of Russia and create something entirely too powerful even for the future government of Russia to contend with. If Putin leaves without that kind of protection, he can be in danger of any autocrat leaving office - those that come after him might... come after him.
 
This latest report from Kommersant makes total sense: finally all oil and gas assets of Russia can be unified under the control of one man - Vladimir Putin. The combined power of Gazprom and Rosneft will make sure that the Kremlin is stacked with those loyal to the Company, just like now Gazprom and Rosneft are run by Putin Loyalists who are also members of his government.
 
And then, sometime in the future, more initial public offerings will float on FTSE or elsewhere with significant chunks being reserved for The Company's Bosses. Behold the the golden parachute and the soft landing it will provide.
 
None of this is meant to sound sinister or to suggest some grandiose plan to take over the world. Mr. Putin is no Goldfinger. One question remains, however, how long will it take to run such a monstrous monopoly into the ground? All his minions are no different from himself - they are all apparatchik bureaucrats of USSR mold. Such people are notorious for creating shortages of whatever they are managing be it natural gas, desert sand or toilet paper.
 
The most grand disservice that Putin did to Russia was not removing gubernatorial elections or taking over NTV. He destroyed what was quickly becoming a world class industry leading by Khodorkovsky's Yukos. That private capitalistic spirit would have propelled Russia, instead, it is becoming oversized Nigeria of Natural Gas with nukes.

Bookmarks:
Add to Technorati FavoritesAdd to Google Reader or HomepageSubscribe in NewsGator OnlineSubscribe in BloglinesAdd to My AOL
BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.5.1.